Sell Off Music

Music Sales by Way of Digital Distribution

Gerd Leonhard Interview @ Los Angeles Music Blog (some good snippets)

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Picture 43 Rollo & Grady Interview // Gerd Leonhard - Los Angeles Music Blog - Good read. Here are some of the best snippets:

R&G: Can the labels regain the trust of “people formerly known as consumers?” Gerd: They may not be able to, and this is the Number One problem. I think it’s a very tough road. The only chance they have – and that goes for everyone, not just the majors, but also the indies – is to drastically open up, put their cards on the table and start doing business like everybody else. This means being transparent, sharing, putting deals on the table and making them public. They need to create real value rather than pretend to do so.

R&G: You’ve talked about how the record industry should adopt Twitter. Can you elaborate? Gerd: Twitter is a mechanism of micro communication, like RSS feeds. Therefore, it becomes something that is completely owned by the people who are doing it, rather than by the people who are making or receiving it. It’s a completely viable mechanism that is cost-neutral, at least to us. It becomes a very powerful mechanism for peer response and viral connections. That is the principle of what music is all about. It’s word of mouth, connecting, forwarding and sharing. A musical version of Twitter would be a goldmine. It already exists to some degree in blip.fm, but the music industry should use that mechanism to broadcast directly to fans. They’re starting to do that, but the problem is that many music companies perceive their primary mission as gatekeeper for the artists rather than getting the music out. That is a big problem today, when you’re in an economy where everybody wants a snack before buying a sandwich.

R&G: What other technologies do you think are necessary for the do-it-yourself artists and managers of the new music world?  Gerd: Widgets and syndication have made YouTube the world’s leader in video. 60% of videos are not played on YouTube.com but on blogs and other people’s sites. Music has completely overlooked that very powerful tool. That is this whole idea of syndication – getting people to transmit music to each other and then reaping the attention on the other end.

R&G: Are you saying they need to recognize any revenue stream they can generate from their content? Sell CDs, subscriptions, etc.? Gerd: The flat rate is the next CD. Its simple mathematics. If you charge or indirectly earn one dollar from each user of a network, that dollar can be ad-supported. It can be supported by bundling, so the user won’t feel it, so to speak. If you look at the total number of people who are active on digital networks, which is somewhere in the neighborhood of 3 ½ billion people, they’re not all going to pay a dollar because they’re in different countries. But the money that comes in from such a flat rate is humongous.

Music 2.0 water meter gerd leonhardGerd leonhard welcome the digital music flat rate


Related posts

Compensation not Control – The Future of Music: video & audio versions of my presentation at MidemNet 2009 (*one of my best ;)

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Finally, here is the video and audio version of my presentation at MidemNet 2009, in Cannes France. I put a ton of work into this presentation and, well, honestly... I think it's one of the best I have ever done on this topic.  Hope you enjoy it - and please comment, below, and / or spread the word!  Thanks to the Midem organization for providing the DVD with this video.

The topics: why the music industry needs to license the Internet just like it has licensed Radio (i.e. with a collective license), why criminalizing the users & fans will not work - and why those efforts should be re-directed to the creation of a new 'Music 2.0' ecosystem that actually produces growing revenues, where those new revenues will come from, and how the music flat rate - aka music like water - would work. See my previous blog post for more details and the PDF of this presentation. The MidemNet blog is here. My free book, Music 2.0, is here, btw;)

Youtube versions here.  MP3 file download: Compensation not Control Futurist Gerd Leonhard MP3

Audio via Soundcloud, below  

Related posts

TrendWatch: Digital music companies that changed their spots

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

You should always stick to your guns, right? Well, not necessarily. Plenty of companies have rethought their business model or approach – and you can argue that this kind of flexibility is increasingly important, given the current economic climate. Here’s five music firms that changed something important – their business model, for example, or their user interface.

We7

UK-based We7 has always focused on ad-supported music, but the format changed pretty drastically in October last year. Originally, the company tacked audio ads onto music downloads. However, its new model is a more standard streaming music service with adverts in between the songs. They claim they’re not abandoning ad-supported downloads – it’s just that they thought the market wasn’t quite ready for them yet. Since then, We7 has focused on promoting its streaming service, revamping its site in the process.

Imeem

Another Music 2.0 service that’s adapted with the times is Imeem. Users had been able to upload as many songs as they liked to the service for no cost, but last month that changed. Imeem now charges $29.99 a year if you want to upload up to 1,000 songs and 100 videos, and $100 if you want a higher limit of 20,000 songs and 500 videos. A spokesperson explained: “We will continue to experiment with new monetisation opportunities if they add to the user experience.” Which is a nice way of saying ‘We need to make more money, and advertising sure ain’t providing it…”

Pandora

Pandora has always been an ad-supported online radio service, but those ads have been banner ads. That changed last month, when the company started serving audio adverts in its music streams. Pandora clearly feels a bit sensitive about the launch – on the company’s official Twitter feed, they said “So you know, we did not take on audio ads lightly. We try to be extremely respectful of your listening experience, & promise to be prudent”. The message showed the problem of this kind of move – a service like Spotify can launch with audio ads from the start and have no problems, but a service like Pandora, which hasn’t had them for its early years, faces consumer unrest when it does introduce them.

Lala

Lala started life as a free streaming music site, which planned to make its money through selling CDs to users, who’d be so excited about the digital music that they’d want to own the physical product. So much for that. In May last year, the company changed tack, with a new business model that involved charging users $0.10 for unlimited streams of a track, and then giving them the option to purchase it as a download (knocking the ten cents off the price if they’d already paid to stream it). Users could also synchronise their existing music library with the site for free streaming of those tracks.

Napster

Okay, so there’s one very obvious change that Napster has gone through – from illegal P2P tool to legal subscription service. But more recently, there’s also been a shift from being a client-based service accessed through a desktop PC application, to a web-based service accessible from any computer. US users got this option back in October 2007, but UK users had to wait until, ahem, this January to get it. With cloud-based music about to be all the rage, it’s a sensible direction to be going in.

Muxtape

The original Muxtape site was a playlisting tool that let people upload any music they wanted in virtual mixtapes for others to listen to. The RIAA stamped it out, so it came back as the same technology, but focused on artists using it to promote their own music. It’s a powerful example of the way even services that fall foul of the music industry can change their business models to try and work within it. Whether the new Muxtape is successful remains to be seen, of course.

Related posts

Meet me in San Francisco, March 4: Presentation on The Future of Content & Telecoms: Flat Rate Content Bundle & Social Media? – eComm2009 Conference

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

The Future of Content & Telecoms: Flat Rate Content Bundles and Social Media - the Next Big Thing? - eComm2009: Emerging Communications Conference.  I have some discount codes for this event - ping me!

Picture 38

Date: Wednesday, March 4

Time: 4:30 - 4:50 PM

Location: Salon E

Imagine a world where unfiltered and limitless access to content is bundled directly into your access to the networks. A world where 'your cloud' holds all kinds of content, your social network connections, your community, and your context (i.e. meta-content), your meta-data and your interaction-trails, and where access to all of this is feels-like-free, legal, always-on and fully mobile, on any and all platforms. This is the future we are heading into, and telecoms, content-owners and brands / advertisers must forge entirely new partnerships.  We are starting to see content creators and rights-owners aborting their long-standing quests for total control, and instead looking to build their audiences and share revenues. So where is this trend going to take us, what do we need to do in order to turn content (music, video, TV, news, games, books...) into a new and truly growing business that is really web-native, where are the big opportunities for telecoms, operators, social networks and rights-holders, and what will the new business models look like? In this context, Gerd will also address topics such as the flat rate for digital music, ISP/Operator + Content bundling examples in Europe and Asia, copyright 2.0 and the future of content commerce, the shift from control-economy to attention &  trust economy, the latest developments in next generation advertising, and the growing economic power of those 'new generatives' (> Kevin Kelly).

Related posts

Marketing Music, 2.0: the declining importance of traditional Air-Play (Radio) versus Net-Play

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Over the course of the next 5-6 years, the importance of getting Air-Play on terrestrial i.e. traditional, programmed radio will drastically decline, as people are switching to the Internet (and by extension, to each other) as the #1 way of sourcing music programs. We will see a drastic increase in fragmentation as people will do anything from carefully customizing each track in their lists to just listen to 'what's on' - and there will be 100s of permutations in between. From total engagement to total passive consumption, there will be offers covering each - and they will all be connected.

Because of the strong uptake in next generation mobile devices (fka cell phones), the explosive proliferation of social networks and the drastic increase in wireless broadband capabilities at ever decreasing costs (yes, not yet - but give it another 18 months) we will see people use their mobile devices as prime instruments of listening to radio-like music programs - there will be hundreds of radio/music apps available via the various app stores that each device maker AND operator will offer; some paid, most feels-like-free, some sponsored.

The other point is that as the car becomes fully connected and always-online people will shift their music consumption to Net-based offerings while on the road, as well (in addition to the already stiff in-car competition from iPods etc) - this will be a very very very serious challenge to traditional Radio (and TV) broadcasters. Local news, traffic, sports etc will be programmable to interlace with your Internet-based stations - the best of both worlds?  Talk about Change!

More resources: my slideshow on the Future of Broadcasting (NPOX 08), my slideshow on the Future of Radio (2007)

Marketing Music 2.0 Gerd Leonhard Futurist white
 

Related posts

Tuesday Business Links: Schumer Speaks Up…As Usual

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

• Senator Charles Schumer has called for the FTC to investigate Ticketmaster. Schumer wants an investigation into anything and everything and frequently says the most ridiculous things (not too long ago he wanted to slap tariffs on Chinese exports if the country didn't stop manipulating its currency). I wouldn't worry until somebody else speaks up. He'll forget it in two weeks and will be on to the next controversy. (Pollstar)

• According to a report by AccuStream iMedia Research, online music purchases reached an estimated $2.7 billion in 2008, up 28.5% over 2007. (The word "global" does not appear in the press release, but the number is certainly far larger than U.S. online music revenue.) In addition, the report estimates that 89.2% of music-related transactions were made up of a la carte purchases of individual tracks or albums. (Press release)

• Sony/ATV and Linda Perry have renewed their worldwide co-publishing deal. (Billboard.biz)

• Some details of the upcoming SoundExchange proposal for small webcasters. (Digital Music News)

• A chart of Compete.com traffic numbers for the top 25 social networking sites in January 2009. Facebook is #1, MySpace is #2 and Twitter is #3. (VentureBeat)

• A sneak peak at the Hikaru, a Walkman-branded, entertainment-focused mobile phone that Sony Ericsson will unveil on the 15th. (SEMC Blog)

• Cory Doctorow comments on the Digital Britain report. "If Britain has a digital future, then it's a sure thing that the Internet will become more important to Britons, not less, and should therefore be more protected, not less. Legal scholar James Boyle describes copyright policy as an 'evidence-free zone.' This school of lawmaking has made a disaster of the young digital age. If we are to have a Digital Britain, we must formulate policy on the basis of fact and evidence, not special pleading and rent-seeking." (The Guardian)

• An interview with Greg Anderson, owner of the Southern Lord label and member of the band Sunn O)))). "The main reason I do this label is to turn people onto music. It’s like tape trading from back in the day magnified one hundred times and turned into a career." (Crave Online)

Related posts

Tonium Announces Technology To Embed Pacemaker Mixes

Tags: , , , , , , ,

Tonium has announced a new feature for their Pacemaker Community, as well as a new MySpace Widget that will allow DJs to embed their Pacemaker mixes into their own blog, website or MySpace page. Hosted on Pacemaker.net, the new Embed button gives the code necessary to embed a mix on the user’s website or personal blog. [...]

Related posts

From The Cure to ‘The Silver Box,’ Roger O’Donnell Synthesizes the Digital-Analog Divide

Tags: , , , , , , ,

The Moog lover and Mac fanatic waxes enthusiastic about digital music and the power of the analog pencil.

Related posts

Have You Ditched the Audio Compact Disc Yet?

Tags: , , , , ,

Whether you solely listen to digital music, prefer the legendary audio compact disc, or do both, there's no question that physical media sales are gradually slowing as consumers discover the...

Related posts

Looking Back at 2008

Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,